Podcasts versus Video casts versus Blogging for SEO

Should I podcast? Should I video cast? Or should I blog? You know. Write. Hit publish. Rinse and repeat.

podcast versus videocast versus blogging

Blogging beats podcast beats video

Podcasts are cool. Unless you sound like me - tweezers on the nose, all nasally.

Videocasts are cooler unless you look like me. I mean, most people if they had a dog with a face like mine they’d shave the dog’s butt and make him walk backwards.

Blogging – the coolest. Just write. And hit publish. Images and links, too, of course.

But what is really cool about blogging is that it is searchable. Findable. Search engines can’t search video and podcast content. These mediums work best… ONLY work?… when they are embedded into a blog post and surrounded by searchable text.

Bottom line…. blogging wins IF you want to be searched out and found. Podcasts and Videocasts are what you serve up AFTER the reader gets there.

In short, nothing is better than the written word when it comes to wanting good search engine optimization.

What is the optimal length for a blog post?

    • This is an exchange with one of the members of TheTrafficProfessor that I thought worth sharing (with minor editing). It will definitely save you time (if you are doing your own writing) and money (if you’re outsourcing content).

      It answers one of the most basic and important questions a blogger will ask.

      What is the optimal length for a blog post?

      ————-

      Sue Anderson LaPointe

      December 22, 2011

      Sue Anderson LaPointe

      • Hi Bill
        Hope you’re doing great, and getting ready for a wonderful Christmas.

      Got into a bit of a blogging conversation/debate and was telling another writer about how much I’d changed my blogging process since your course. He’s got a mentor ….., who’s swearing by 2000 word posts, which seems nuts to me.

      I told him about your idea of frequency, and he replied: “If Bill Belew built his sites in 2005+ era, that strategy would have worked. And now that his sites are *already* authority sites from before, it doesn’t matter what he posts because it’s already an authority site. But he’s mistakenly projecting past Google conditions onto today. A new site won’t rank with that same strategy that way have worked even just 5 years ago. So the question is, did Bill Belew start these sites back then or did he start them very recently?”

      I think your sites are more recent, but didn’t want to answer incorrectly. Also, figured that might be a great question to answer on your blog! and in the marketing.

      Hugs and all warm wishes -
      Sue

  • Bill Belew

    December 22, 2011

    Bill Belew

    • I started back in 2006. Still…2000-word posts are great but they are not for Search Engines. Ask yourself how many times you have searched for something and found it in the 400th or 1000th or 2000th word section of an article. Doesn’t happen. SEO = a balance between what appeals to a real person and what appeals to a search engine. 2000 word articles don’t have much appeal to readers either. Invariably when you do a search, find the link you want and click on it, the very next think you do is scroll down to find out how long the article is…if it is too long, you go away, right? This is called Bounce. And the higher the bounce rate, the worse the SE findability. The ideal length for a blog post is something that will fit above one click of the scroll. Make sense?

  • Mike Maunu

    December 22, 2011

    Mike Maunu

    • In addition, not all the blogs were started then and many of Bill’s students only started in the last 18 months and they are getting the same results based on the lower word count.

  • Sue Anderson LaPointe

    December 22, 2011

    Sue Anderson LaPointe

    • THAT is fantastic news, then… because I’m getting totally hooked on these little 200 worders  Totally makes sense for readability – If I want to read 2000 words on something, would rather read 10 posts on it than one post. I’m in the process of creating blogging packages for my writing clients based on this and was SO hoping/then glad to find 200 words will get it done!
      Thank you guys for getting back to me so fast.
      HUGS!
      Sue

  • Bill Belew

    December 22, 2011

    Bill Belew

    • 200-300 words will suffice. Each blog posts generally answers one question. It never takes 2000 words to answer a question unless you are a preacher…. 

  • Sue Anderson LaPointe

    December 22, 2011

    Sue Anderson LaPointe

    • Lol. True that!!!!! I’m loving how much easier it is to blog like this. It’s actually getting done rather than languishing months between posts!!!

      ———

 Hope you found this exchange useful.
Let me know if you have any questions/concerns you want addressed and I’ll do it here.
Taks a look at TheTrafficProfessor. It will guide you in achieving your traffic goals.
Oh – December ’11 – 4.8 million total page views. Best month ever for me. How was your month?